{"id":3478,"date":"2019-08-16T14:54:06","date_gmt":"2019-08-16T14:54:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/perlaw.ca\/?p=3478"},"modified":"2019-09-18T15:27:23","modified_gmt":"2019-09-18T15:27:23","slug":"collito-timing-issues-related-to-the-collection-provisions-of-the-income-tax-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/perlaw.ca\/fr\/2019\/08\/16\/collito-timing-issues-related-to-the-collection-provisions-of-the-income-tax-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Collito: Timing Issues Related to the Collection Provisions of the Income Tax Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The\u00a0<em>Income Tax Act\u00a0<\/em>(the \u201c<em>Tax Act<\/em>\u201d) contains provisions that allow the Minister of National Revenue (the \u201cMinister\u201d) to collect amounts owed by one taxpayer under the\u00a0<em>Tax Act<\/em>\u00a0from another person. Under paragraph 160(1)(e) of the\u00a0<em>Tax Act<\/em>, where a taxpayer has transferred property to a non-arm\u2019s length person for less than fair market value consideration, the transferor and transferee are jointly and severally liable for taxes that the transferor otherwise owes.<\/p>\n<p>Section 227.1 of the\u00a0<em>Tax Act\u00a0<\/em>provides that directors of a corporation are jointly and severally liable with the corporation if the corporation fails to deduct, withhold, or remit tax as required by certain provisions of the\u00a0<em>Tax Act<\/em>. Importantly, the director\u2019s liability is limited to situations in which the corporation is dissolved, bankrupt, or an execution for the corporation\u2019s tax debt has been returned unsatisfied.<\/p>\n<p>In\u00a0<em>Colitto v The Queen<\/em>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/ca\/tcc\/doc\/2019\/2019tcc88\/2019tcc88.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">2019 TCC 88<\/a>, the Tax Court of Canada examined when the cascading application of these provisions applies to a person who receives property at less than fair market value from a director of a corporation with an uncollected tax liability. The Tax Court held that the liability of such recipient only applies after the Minister has satisfied the preconditions of section 227.1.<\/p>\n<p>In 2008, the taxpayer\u2019s spouse transferred his 50% interest in two properties to the taxpayer for nominal consideration, which resulted in a total benefit to the taxpayer of over $200,000. In the same year, a corporation of which the taxpayer\u2019s spouse was a director failed to remit source deductions. In 2009, a certificate for the corporation\u2019s tax debt was registered in the Federal Court. In 2011, after collection of the corporation\u2019s tax debt was unsatisfied, the Minister assessed the taxpayer\u2019s spouse under section 227.1. The taxpayer was not assessed under section 160 until 2016.<\/p>\n<p>The only issue before the Tax Court was the timing of the taxpayer\u2019s spouse\u2019s liability for the corporation\u2019s failure to remit its source deductions, and how that timing related to the taxpayer\u2019s liability in respect of the transfers of property from the taxpayer\u2019s spouse. The parties had agreed that: the taxpayer\u2019s spouse was a director at the time the corporation failed to remit; he did not exercise due diligence to prevent such failure; and no limitation period defence was available.<\/p>\n<p>The Tax Court undertook a textual, contextual and purposive analysis of section 227.1 and found that director\u2019s liability does not arise unless and until the relevant preconditions are satisfied. Importantly, the Tax Court held that \u201cthere is no language in section 227.1 which provides that the liability should be applied retroactively once it arises\u201d (at paragraph 71). As a result, the Tax Court held that the taxpayer\u2019s spouse was not liable as a director until 2011, when execution of the corporation\u2019s tax debt was returned unsatisfied, and not in 2008 when the corporation failed to remit. Therefore, the cascading assessments against the taxpayer were vacated.<\/p>\n<p>The Minister has appealed the decision. If the decision is upheld by the Federal Court of Appeal, it will be interesting to see if collection efforts are accelerated or the government chooses to address the issue through legislative amendments.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The\u00a0Income Tax Act\u00a0(the \u201cTax Act\u201d) contains provisions that allow the Minister of National Revenue (the \u201cMinister\u201d) to collect amounts owed by one taxpayer under the\u00a0Tax Act\u00a0from another person. Under paragraph 160(1)(e) of the\u00a0Tax Act, where a taxpayer has transferred property to a non-arm\u2019s length person for less than fair market value consideration, the transferor and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"wds_primary_category":0,"wds_primary_expertise_area":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[161],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3478","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-publications","expertise_area-impot-des-particuliers","expertise_area-fiscalite"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/perlaw.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3478","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/perlaw.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/perlaw.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perlaw.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perlaw.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3478"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/perlaw.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3478\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3480,"href":"https:\/\/perlaw.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3478\/revisions\/3480"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/perlaw.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perlaw.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perlaw.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}